Hell and high water

War and remembrance

It’s been a couple of months since I’ve written, and we’re already in the last quarter of another turbulent year. How time flies…

When I was a boy, November meant Guy Fawkes Night but it also meant Remembrance Sunday. Back in the dim and distant nineteen-seventies, you barely needed a day to ‘remember’, as Sir John Mills was perpetually re-enacting WW2 on TV, toyshops were full of Action Men and Airfix Spitfires, and family members were constantly reminiscing. It was a collective form of social catharsis, I guess. In the days before people spoke much of emotions, let alone of mental health…

On Sunday November 12, the veterans at Alexandra Park in Hastings were standing in regimental knots in the drizzle – Paras here, Royal Marines there, veterans of the Queen’s, sappers, gunners, sailors, airmen and women. Doubtless, they were doing what my grandparents’ generation did, and talking their way through their memories with the only people who really understood. I was glad to lay a wreath on behalf of the Liberal Democrats, and I cast my mind across to Rye, where I knew the same event would be taking place with the same reverence and the same recollections.

The most recent names on our war memorial are for Fusilier Stephen Satchell, 18, and Corporal John Rigby, 24. Both were killed in Iraq, and I often point out their names to my kids as we stroll down to The Ypres, as those two young men might well have done not so very long ago. They lost their lives in 1991 and 2007, dates recent enough that my young children might almost manage to relate to Stephen and John, and appreciate the lives they led and the world they gave up for their country and their community. And that’s surely what remembrance is about.

Rain, rain, go away…

Remembrance Sunday was mercifully not too wet, but the week before, the rains had come in earnest. Standing in Lea Avenue up to my wellied shins in water, I could see many a worried face amongst the people standing dubiously on their doorsteps. Reassuringly, I could also see the delightfully world-weary countenance of Shaun Rogers, who, along with his Fire Service colleagues, was going diligently from door to door purveying advice and guidance to residents. I thought at the time that our over-stretched fire service shouldn’t have to be baling out Southern Water. Long term, families on Tilling Green need the peace of mind that dependable pumping equipment, investment and maintenance provide.

Circumstances like this and the flooding and sewage discharges in Hastings are one of the reasons Lib Dems want to replace water regulator, Ofwat, with a body that has real teeth. Lib Dems would also change the current corporate model of the water companies, transforming them into Public Benefit Companies, which would essentially do precisely what it says on the tin – their corporate mission would be one of public service, not of private profit. We’d also turn off the open stop-cock pumping cash into water-bosses’ bonus accounts. I don’t begrudge capitalism rewarding success, but under the current circumstances, it defies all logic.

Keep the blue flag flying

Labour under Jeremy Corbyn were ideologically pro-nationalisation, which has appeal for some, particularly those who look at publicly-owned European utility companies. However, the costs of nationalisation, whether upfront or long term would be colossal, and as Labour start to hastily manage down voter expectations, that proposal’s been binned. Though the party have made much political capital out of the issue of flooding and pollution, I’m not sure what Sir Keir’s latest plan is for the water utilities. But was he giving us a clue in his recent Sunday Telegraph article? In the December 3 piece he professed to admire the architect of privatisation, one Margaret Hilda Thatcher. That was something of a surprise to me I have to say, but many disgruntled Labour commentators online seemed far less shocked. But Starmer’s slightly transparent signalling to Conservative voters tells us something important and rather depressing about our broken politics.

Sir Keir is named after Keir Hardie, the founder of the Labour Party; he leads a party that was ‘born in the belly of the Trades Unions’, and his dad, as he frequently reminds us, was a tool maker. But Sir Keir’s a Labour leader shamelessly chasing Conservative votes – it begs the question of whether he actually wants traditional Labour votes, but apparently he’s taking that support for granted…

Now, there’s nothing wrong with trying to court consensus or to build an electoral coalition, but that’s not what Sir Keir’s doing. He’s courting swing voters at the expense of his traditional supporters – and possibility his credibility. Sadly, Starmer is engaging in the same old short term, zero-sum partisan politics that’s helped to stifle investment, stall economic growth and utterly destroy people’s faith in politicians and democracy.

My dear old ma, meanwhile, is a lady who really does admire Mrs Thatcher – for better or worse! I remember that she stayed up all night in 1979, watching the votes come rolling in. So I asked her whether she was won over by Sir Keir’s apparent conversion and would now be voting Labour. Put it this way, the lady’s not for turning red… though I haven’t given up on trying to turn her yellow!

Christmas cancelled

As we approach Christmas, there’s a certain bitter irony in knowing that it’s literally been cancelled in Bethlehem, in the Occupied Palestinian West Bank. Events since the appalling acts of terrorism committed on October 7 have dominated the news here and strained community cohesion across the country.

Personally, I have never understood why many of our politicians prioritise the professional needs of allied militaries over the lives and rights of men, women and children. The essential business of killing always seems to take precedence over the marginal business of diplomacy or humanity. Lives lost can always seemingly be justified with neat phrases and smooth logic. I know what the military case is, but it’s a false prospectus.

As the death toll in Gaza approaches an abhorrent 15,000 people, including an estimated 4,000 children, it seems astonishing to me that the Greens, the SNP and the Liberal Democrats are the only parties to be calling for a ceasefire, and as of December 5, there’s been no debate in the House of Commons on a conflict that could yet fulminate into a regional war like that to which Tony Blair committed UK Forces in 2003. Note that in December 2020, the Conservative government signed a UK-Israel military cooperation agreement designed to “deepen our cooperation”, and the RAF is already operating over Gaza. So, shouldn’t we be allocating some Parliamentary time?

Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition…

Whilst, honestly, I wish my own party had called for a ceasefire sooner and made greater reference to the broader context of occupation, I have been impressed by the moderation and judiciousness modelled by Layla Moran, our Foreign Affairs spokesperson, whose own family are in the Gaza cauldron, and who has already lost a relative in the conflict.

Meanwhile, as the dead pile up in Gaza and the West Bank, the Labour and Conservative leaderships are caught in a cynical electoral stand-off to see which of them can prevaricate the longest, and which of them can affirm their support for Israel the most emphatically and the most robotically.

The great irony of Sunak and Starmer’s identical stance, is that it not only ruthlessly prolongs Palestinian agonies, but is diametrically opposed to the interests of ordinary Israelis – let alone that of the hostages. Prolonged conflict and unconscionable casualties diminish the perceived legitimacy of Israel’s military operation, catastrophically reduce its international standing, and that of its allies; they act as a recruiting sergeant for Hamas and other regional Jihadist groups, and lend greater credibility to Iran’s claim to be Palestine’s only defender. Putin, of course, is also very, very grateful for the distraction and enjoying immensely seeing international law over-ridden. Not only that, in the UK, Israel’s assault on Gaza is increasing community tensions and fuelling Islamophobia and anti-semitism – prejudices for which there’s never any excuse. So, to put it very brutally, you don’t have to care a jot for the imperilled children of Gaza to understand that this needs to stop right now. Though I’m certain very many of us do care…

In the meantime, self-serving party politics and cynical electoral calculation precludes grown-up debate, and seems to prevent many MPs saying what ought to be so obvious and so natural: ‘We need to stop bombing children.’

I know I’ve managed to get to the end of this letter without doing much to lift anybody’s spirits… So I profusely apologise, and I trust the coming festivities will lift everybody’s mood. It’s certain that 2024 is going to be a year of change for us all, and I hope, sincerely, it’ll be brighter and better for everyone… let’s face it, it can’t get much worse!

Merry Christmas.

Image Credits: Guy Harris .

Previous articleIf music be the food of love
Next articleUpdate from Sally-Ann Hart

5 COMMENTS

  1. Thanks, Robert. That’s kind of you.
    I should have added in my article, if anyone wants to get in touch for any reason – to raise issues of local or national concern, to ask for advice or help or simply to say hello, I have a Lib Dem email as below. I’d be very glad to hear from anyone, and if I can help, or the Lib Dem community can, we will.
    ryeguylibdem@gmail.com

  2. Thanks Guy. Lots of good observations.
    I have thought long and hard about the Palestinian issue from a non partisan position and I can’t say that I have come to any optimistic conclusions.
    Some things seem self evident. The attack by Hamas on the kibbutz, which vastly more barbaric and shocking than was commonly reported, was appalling, maybe even seeming to be an intentional provocation. That Israel killing more or less defenceless civilians is completely abhorrent, even though the civilian population and Hamas are so thoroughly integrated. That a ceasefire for humanitarian relief would be a very good thing.
    But if you have your hands around a crocodile’s nose, wouldn’t you think twice before letting go? If you are Israel and the crocodile is Hamas, with a written constitution that commits it to your destruction, what do you do? Let go, knowing very well that the crocodile will not only come back to bite you, but probably bring some friends along too? Or keep a firm grip, hoping the crocodile will become exhausted?
    In common with many other issues, the matter stimulates simple answers to an immensely challenging problem. I can’t see any simple answers, assuming of course that we can’t rewrite history.

  3. Hi, Bob.
    To borrow your excellent crocodile metaphor, we have to understand why the crocodile exists and why it keeps trying to bite. Hamas came into being in ‘88. It evolved gradually as a response to the Israeli occupation, which began in 1967 and has continued for 56 years. That’s not to absolve Hamas of the bestial horrors of October 7th (or those committed before), but to understand why it exists and what the broader context is of this miserable, bloody chaos.
    In essence, this is a very prosaic human problem, nothing to do with flags or faiths. Humans are very easy to understand, and one thing humans don’t like at all is to be denied their self determination generation after generation. That’s going to cause ructions…
    I think October 7th demonstrated conclusively that you cannot in fact ‘hold on to a crocodile’s nose’ forever. Benjamin Netanyahu’s contention has always been that you could, whilst using the savage drama of the struggle to distract from how the crocodile got there in the first place and why its tail keeps flailing murderously at the very people he claimed his policy would protect…

    To differ, Bob, I think there are actually simple solutions – they’re set out clearly in law. We simply haven’t tried hard enough to impel them. Like many other issues, it’s easier to kick the can down the road. But if the deaths of 1200 Israelis and 20,000 Palestinians teach us anything it’s that now’s the time to try something new – like talking in good faith, applying international law, ending the occupation and finally creating a viable Palestinian state.
    And to belabour the reptilian metaphor for one last gambit, you can indeed talk to crocodiles. We talked to the IRA, to the Taliban, and I can tell you from personal experience, we talked to elements of al-Qaeda. So, we can solve this, and we owe it to Palestinians and Israelis to try. But we certainly can’t solve it whilst tolerating the expansion of illegal settlements and a draconian military occupation. And we probably can’t do it with the current generation of political pygmies either… So I share your ambivalence in that one regard!
    Merry Christmas, Bob.

  4. I think there are a lot of obstacles between where we are and a peaceful settlement, Guy, but I concede to your experience and appreciate your positive optimism. Happy Christmas!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here